Helping consumers in LA and throughout Southern California
PLEASE NOTE: To protect your safety in response to threats of COVID-19, we are offering our clients the ability to meet with us via telephone or through video conferencing. Please call our office to discuss your options.
Experienced attorneys here to help you recover costs associated with persistent automotive problems.
As a California resident, you likely already know that our state has a very strict Lemon Law regarding vehicles that you buy or lease. What you may not know, however, is that you and the vehicle manufacturer must go through an arbitration process to avail yourself of the Lemon Law protections. Furthermore, a state-certified arbitration program must conduct the arbitration hearing.
While you may think that the Arbitration Certification Program conducts these hearings, such is not the case. Instead, the ACP’s mission is merely to certify arbitration programs whose processes not only comply with the Lemon Law, but also provide a fair and expeditious process by which to resolve Lemon Law disputes. The ACP has oversight authority only. It neither conducts arbitration hearings nor modifies nor overturns arbitration decisions.
Basically, when you buy or lease a new or used vehicle in California, the Lemon Law protects you if your vehicle develops warranty defects that its manufacturer or the dealer you bought or leased from cannot fix. This protection lasts throughout the term of your original warranty. Should you serve in the U.S. military and become stationed in California, you can also receive Lemon Law protection regardless of where you bought or leased your vehicle.
Under the Lemon Law’s presumption, your vehicle qualifies as a lemon if any of the following things happen within 18 months of your purchase or lease or during the first 18,000 miles you drive the vehicle:
Once qualified as a lemon, the Lemon Law entitles you to either a return of your purchase price or a replacement vehicle. However, you should know that the manufacturer can try to rebut this presumption during arbitration.